Phone: 604-558-8778
Toll Free: 1-855-558-8778

The Right Drug Defence

A drug conviction can have lifelong implications.

Drug related offences, particularly trafficking and possession for the purpose of trafficking, are some of the most heavily resourced police files. Police receive extensive training and are provided unlimited resources to utilize a variety of investigative techniques for drug cases. Some of these techniques include:

-Surveillance
-Confidential informants
-Wiretaps
-Undercover officers
-Trafficking devices

The accused is often faced with a large amount of evidence against him/her. The drug case looks bad and the penalties and implications can be very serious.

As drug cases have many layers, a wide variety of legal issues arise. It is important to go through all the evidence with a fine tooth comb and flush out the different issues.

Drug cases require strong preparation, excellent strategy, and more importantly, the right lawyer and legal team.

We have recently achieved some remarkable results for our clients with drug charges. Our extensive experience on drug cases has allowed us to develop specialized knowledge and a specific approach to handling these types of complex cases.

 

0

Kevin Filkow chairs TLABC webinar on the Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) regime

Kevin Filkow presented to members of the Trial Lawyers Association of BC on March 3, 2016. The informative webinar instructed lawyers on the Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”)  regime. The topics covered were:

  • Issues that determine whether a client should file for a review
  • Challenging the admissibility of evidence
  • Challenging the credibility and reliability of evidence
  • Taking advantage of police mistakes
  • Common mistakes that lawyers seem to be making
  • The inside scoop on the workings of RoadSafetyBC and its policies
  • The FST – how it works, why it was introduced and the basics of calibration testings
  • New case law
  • The remedial programs

The Immediate Roadside Prohibition regime is very different than how the system used to work. The process is different. The laws are different. The issues are different.  The timelines are different. The decision makers are different. It has become a very specialized area.

Filkow Law is a leading BC law firm dealing with drinking and driving offences. If you receive an IRP – you have 7 days to dispute it. Contact us at 604-558-8778 to discuss.

0

Alcohol related offences highest during holidays

December is a busy time of year for all of us. Friends and families come together, enjoy good company, food and wine…and maybe beer…and vodka… and a long drive home. It is no surprise that impaired driving rates are highest in December. In fact, there were an estimated 24,000 cars stopped at BC police check stops last Friday night alone. Inevitably, your chance of receiving an Immediate Roadside Prohibition or being charged with a driving offence is exponentially higher during the holiday season.

An Immediate Roadside Prohibition (commonly referred to as an “IRP”) is a driving prohibition issued under the British Columbia Motor Vehicle Act to drivers found to have a blood alcohol concentration of 50 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood (50 mg% or 0.05 BAC) and above. These prohibitions begin immediately, and can vary in length from 3 days (if you blow a WARN) to 90 days (if you blow a FAIL or refuse to provide a breath sample).

If you receive a 90 day prohibition, your vehicle will also be impounded for 30 days, and you will be responsible for the costs associated with towing and storage. This is accompanied by a $500 fine, a $250.00 license reinstatement fee, and a referral to the Responsible Driver Program, which costs over $800. Another possible consequence of an IRP is a referral to the Ignition Interlock Program, which will cost you over $1000, plus maintenance fees.

What many people don’t know about Immediate Roadside Prohibitions is that you have 7 days to dispute them. If you do not respond within 7 days, your IRP will be confirmed, it will remain on your driving record, and you can look forward to paying all those fees listed above! Not exactly the type of gifts you had in mind this holiday season! It is very easy to get caught up in all the holiday madness and forget this crucial deadline.

If you or someone you know have received an Immediate Roadside Prohibition or have been charged with a driving offence, contact Filkow Law at 604-558-8778 for proper legal assistance. Filkow Law is a leading BC law firm experienced dealing with drinking and driving offences.

4

British Columbia’s Drinking and Driving Laws

This is the second part of my paper on British Columbia’s Drinking and Driving laws. Part one appeared in the last issue of The Verdict (Fall 2013), Trial Lawyers Association of BC.

The Government appears to find it politically advantageous to proclaim that the IRP legislation represents the “strictest impaired driving laws around.” This claim simply isn’t true, at least as a general proposition. Those who have financial resources and don’t depend on driving for their employment are far less penalized by the IRP regime than they would be under the Criminal Code. They pay for the fines and the programs imposed, and resume driving after three months. It is lower income, rural and/or younger drivers who are more likely to be harshly affected – often for years because they cannot afford to pay for the mandatory post-prohibition programs. Those whose employment requires being able to drive may also suffer inordinately, as they lose their jobs and they and their families suffer serious corollary effects from the loss of income.
The very real and substantial penalties that often flow from the IRP regime would be acceptable if the review process were fair. But it is not. There is virtually no means of challenging the word of the officer regarding what took place at the roadside, and the lack of checks and balances in turn will almost inevitably lead to an arrogant undesirable police culture.
The cynical culture of the IRP regime should not be allowed to perpetuate. There is some hope that the constitutional challenge in Sivia will receive a more comprehensive resolution from the Court of Appeal. In the meantime, we must fight for just outcomes and a fairer regime as best we can with the resources at our disposal.

Also see the original paper The Unsettling Unfairness of the IRP Regime.

1

Kevin Filkow chairs annual Criminal Law Conference for Trial Lawyers of BC

I am pleased to chair this year’s Criminal Law conference for the Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia. I was also chairperson in 2011 and 2012. They were excellent and instructive conferences. The audience and speakers included judges, media, journalists, defense counsel and crown prosecutors.

The theme of the 2014 conference is Criminal Law at a Crossroads: New Practice Strategies. Topics that will be covered include civil forfeiture proceedings and charter violations; police-issued process and warrants; expert evidence in drug cases; bail reviews; video testimony; recanting witnesses; pre-trial credit, victim fine surcharges; mandatory minimums; bail reviews; new issues in drinking and driving laws and pardons.

This year’s conference will be held at the Vancouver Hyatt on September 19th, 2014. I look forward to it once again.

0

Filkow Law Opens A New Kelowna Office

We are proud to announce the opening of our new Filkow Law Kelowna location. Our new criminal law office is located in the heart of downtown Kelowna at 1638 Pandosy Street in suite #20.

There is ample street parking and the Chapman parkade is half a block away.

Contact us at our Kelowna criminal law office: (250) 860-2744.

Mailing and physical address: 1638 Pandosy Street #20, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1P8

0

Kevin Filkow presents leading seminar on drinking and driving laws and IRPs, 2015

BC Police forces have begun using the new Alco-Sensor FST for use in Immediate Roadside Prohibitions.  This new breathalyzer has several important differences over the previously used versions.  The new version has been designed to attempt to limit the amount of user-errors by the police that were being observed and leading to unreliable results.

First, the device is programmed to not accept a sample if it is expired.  It is also programmed to not accept a sample if it is outside of the now-expanded temperature range.

Secondly, the device has a completely different set of messages that are possible compared to the old devices.

This will likely eliminate many of the factors that would historically lead to unreliable test results with previous devices, but there are still some factors that can indicate whether an FST reading is reliable or not.

If you have received an Immediate Roadside Prohibition, it is very important to have an experienced lawyer review your case and get proper legal advice as to whether your test results can be relied upon.

0

Police Roll Out New Breathalyzers

 

DrunkDrive

BC Police forces have begun using the new Alco-Sensor FST for use in Immediate Roadside Prohibitions.  This new breathalyzer has several important differences over the previously used versions.  The new version has been designed to attempt to limit the amount of user-errors by the police that were being observed and leading to unreliable results.

First, the device is programmed to not accept a sample if it is expired.  It is also programmed to not accept a sample if it is outside of the now-expanded temperature range.

Secondly, the device has a completely different set of messages that are possible compared to the old devices.

This will likely eliminate many of the factors that would historically lead to unreliable test results with previous devices, but there are still some factors that can indicate whether an FST reading is reliable or not.

If you have received an Immediate Roadside Prohibition, it is very important to have an experienced lawyer review your case and get proper legal advice as to whether your test results can be relied upon.

0

The Unsettling Unfairness of the IRP Regime

The Immediate Roadside Prohibition regime became effective September 20, 2010. The police, not without their own failings, would determine the fate of any individual pulled over, or otherwise detained, to blow into a roadside screening device. Police officers’ reports of what took place at a roadside stop would fundamentally serve as the basis for implementing these penalties under the new regime. Now, three years after the regime was implemented, thousands of drivers have been subjected to the serious penalties mandated by the IRP scheme, and drivers, who formerly would have been dealt with under the criminal system, and many others besides, are now being subject to IRPs instead.

See Kevin Filkow’s full paper on BC’s IRP drinking and driving laws.

0